Thursday, October 15, 2020

BETTER BASEBALL

 

               Necessity, it’s said, is the mother of invention, and 2020 having been one motha of a baseball season it followed that it included a lot of inventions. Circumventing the virus took some doing, as did stuffing a regular-season race into a 60-game box. The game’s decades-long struggle to make itself faster and sleeker continued to hover, as did the trends toward more strikeouts and fewer base hits.  Attention had to be paid.

               Attend the MLB’s leaders did, and pretty well, too. The no-fans regime was the biggest change ever for the National Pastime, and while the vast stretches of empty seats were jarring they were ameliorated by the fan cutouts and piped-in crowd noises that, on TV at least, almost substituted for the real thing.  The game’s dugouts-and-sidelines covid protocols were widely ignored but the players surprised many (including me) by their admirable adherence to monastic rules outside the ballparks in no-bubble settings. This permitted the makeshift schedule to play out about as planned, with only two teams (the Miami Marlins and St Louis Cardinals) committing major breaches. Interestingly, both of them rallied to make the playoffs.

               There also were changes aplenty in the game on the field—more than in any season in memory for the change-averse sport.  MLB expanded the playoffs to 16 teams from  12; forced the designed-hitter rule on the National League; increased rosters to an initial 30 players (from 25 last season) and 28 for the playoffs; made double-header games seven-inning affairs; required relief pitchers to face at least three batters or stay until an inning’s end; and began extra innings with a “free” runner on second base.

None of those changes are sure to carry over to future seasons, but some might.  I heretofore have fancied myself a baseball “purist” but you know somethin’? I liked them all. Taking them one at a time, here are my takes:

EXPANDED PLAYOFFS— A good idea, and overdue, although it was spurred by the immediate need for more TV revenue to compensate for the lack of gate monies. This season’s 16 qualifiers in a 30-team mix was a bit much, so until MLB expands to 32 teams 14 would be a nice compromise, and I read it probably will happen. No more one-and-done wildcard rounds was good, too.

THE DH FOR THE NL—The designated hitter has been the rule in the American League since 1973, and while the AL-NL split on the matter has been an ever-present bone for baseball fans to chew, it has tasted like cardboard for a long time. The votes are in and they are nearly unanimous, the DH having been adopted in just about every level of organized baseball—the schools, colleges, amateurs, minor leagues and international play. The only two entities still holding out against it are the U.S. National League and Nippon Professional Baseball’s Central League, one of two such circuits in that land.

The DH promotes offense, something that’s needed especially now, and prolongs careers.  Few things in baseball are sadder than a pitcher with a bat in his hands; some act like they don’t know which end to hold. Most can’t even bunt, for heaven’s sake. The NL came within a whit of adding it in 1980 when, in a confused and confusing action, the 12 league owners voted four for and five against, with three abstentions, to uphold the status quo. I once enjoyed the tactical differences the AL-NL split created, but they’re just tiresome now. It’s about time the NL joined the party.

INCREASED ROSTER SIZES— Rosters were scheduled to be upped to 26 players from 25 this season but the disruptions caused by the virus threat supersized that—to 30 at the start of the 60-game schedule and 28 for the playoffs. The original plan of 26 is supposed to be reinstated for 2021, but I think it falls a man short. With 27 players—one more pitcher and one position player—teams could spread around playing time in a way that makes sense over the game’s long, long season. The players’ union, which can act on all such changes, would go along happily, and the probable cost—one more minimum-wage player—shouldn’t be too large for the owners to swallow.

SEVEN-INNING GAMES FOR DOUBLEHEADERS—This was pretty much of a one-off change because two-for-the-price-of-one doubleheaders in the majors are relics of bygone eras, for 40 or so years and counting. This season was an exception because of the narrow scheduling window and the log jams created by the multiple positive-test cancellations of the Marlins and Cardinals. The odd doubleheader these days comes about because of the need to make up weather-caused cancellations, and if players and managers could vote they’d adopt the seven-inning rule. That’s already the way things are done in the minor leagues and colleges, where doubleheaders are more frequent.

A THREE-BATTER RULE FOR RELIEVERS—I’m for just about anything that moves games along, and nothing slows them like mid-inning pitching changes. This is a good rule, but the rub is that with the end-of-inning exception it rarely applies. More helpful would be to mandate that relievers be driven to the mound quickly by cart and limited to two or three warmup pitches instead of the present six. What have they been doing in the bullpen, anyway?

A MAN-ON-SECOND-BASE START TO EXTRA INNINGS—This is the most unbaseballlike of the 2020 rule changes but I liked it a lot, just as I did when it was used in last year’s Fall League. Before when games went into extras I’d say “Oh, nuts” or something similar. This season I found myself saying “Oh, goodie!”

Giving teams a “free” runner is a wrench, and scoring it put some Figure Filberts’ noses out of joint, but so what?  The freebie is scored as an error even though none is charged to the team or any player; if the run scores it’s unearned to the pitcher. The situation sets up an interesting tactical question for the first-up team: bunt the guy over or swing away? In keeping with the ethos of the times, most teams this season chose option two, but with a strong pitcher of its own on the mound option one could be preferrable.  

A complaint about the rule is that it puts a sort of clock on the game-without-a-clock, but that ain’t necessarily so. If teams match each other run for run games could run indefinitely. They don’t figure to for long, though, which suits me fine. 

 

 

 

Thursday, October 1, 2020

A VERY GOOD YEAR

 

               This baseball season has been unusual in many respects, but for me one is worth celebrating. That would be the fact that the two diamond representatives of Chicago, the land of my birth, were alive and playing when regular-season hostilities ended.

               Since the city has had two shots at post-season glory annually since the official beginning of the sport’s recorded time —1901— such a thing might be expected to go unnoted in the ordinary course of things. But as any baseball fan knows, the National League Cubs and the American League White Sox have been extraordinary for most of their histories—extraordinarily bad.

The Cubs’ 108-year failure to capture a World Series title (1908 to 2016), baseball’s biggest prize, has been the stuff of legend, whispered around campfires by the likes of the Alaskan Inuit and the New Zealand Maori. The White Sox’s 88-year gap in that respect—1917 to 2005– would have been a bigger deal if it weren’t for their crosstown counterparts’ greater record of ineptitude.

The lesser prizes that were multiplied by the game’s playoff expansion starting in 1969 have been almost as elusive; each team has been only an occasional visitor to such proceedings. They’ve made it together just once before—in 2008—and that year shared a first-round exit. An “El World Series” matching the two Windy City franchises happened but once, in 1906.

That Series stands out in the event’s annals because it matched two quite-different teams. The Cubs, starting a three-year World Series run, recorded a regular-season winning percentage of .763 (116-36) enroute to the showdown, setting a record that still stands. The White Sox qualified despite an AL-worst team batting average of .230 that was anemic even in those “dead ball” days and earned them the enduring label of “Hitless Wonders.” Naturally in matters Chicago, perversity prevailed and the Sox won it, four games to two.

  History’s circularity has expressed itself again this year because it’s the Cubs who wear the “Hitless Wonders” tag. They won the NL Central Division title despite a team batting average of .220, the 27th best among the Majors’ 30 teams. They distinguished themselves further by striking out 559 times, the fifth-worst mark, “Dead Ball Era” be damned.

The Cubs’ standings’ stature was all the more baffling because the team’s worst hitters were the ones who led them to the World Series and five straight winning seasons starting in 2015. Kris Bryant, the NL’s MVP in ’16, hit a measly .206 this season, Javier Baez, the MVP runnerup in 2018, hit .203, the usually trusty Anthony Rizzo came in at .222 and Kyle Schwarber, the young Ruthian, managed but a .188 mark. The team escaped covid-19 but its astonishing weakness at the plate suggests another contagion. No kidding.

 The Cubs really had two seasons this year, a 13-3 won-lost start and a sub-.500 (21-23) finish. They did as well as they did mostly because of their pitching, an historical oddity. Yu Darvish, the slim Japanese with a full deck of offerings, finally came through with the sorts of performances the team envisioned when it paid him $126 million (for six years) in 2018, and the estimable Kyle Hendricks continued to confound hitters with his off-speed tricks. The team’s bullpen, a pre-season question mark, got better as the season progressed. Sans a hitting miracle, if the Cubs are to advance in the playoffs it will be pitching that carries them.

The White Sox’ recent history has been worse than that of the Cubs’, that 2008 playoff appearance being their last post-season exposure and their last seven seasons being losing ones. Their turnaround began in 2014 when their front office implemented a BOP (bad on purpose) strategy, dumping veterans (and games) to improve via trades for prospects and the draft. It’s the same tack the Cubs used when Theo Epstein took them over in 2012, and involved some of the same people. Sox manager Rick Renteria was Epstein’s choice to manage the Cubs in 2014 before Joe Maddon became available, and the Sox got young super-prospect Eloy Jimenez from the Cubs in a 2017 deal for veteran pitcher Jose Quintana.

The 2020 Sox resemble the 2015 Cubs, a young bunch having fun and flexing new-found  muscles but maybe a year away from serious contention. Young hitters Jimenez, Tim Anderson, Yoan Moncada, Luis Robert and Nick Madrigal, abetted by vets Jose Abreu and Yasmani Grandal, can score, and led the American League in home runs with 96. They have a couple of top-tier starting pitchers in Lucas Giolito and Dallas Kuechel, and an up and down bullpen. They were the talk of the Majors through the season’s first 50 games, vying for the AL’s best record, but lost seven of their last eight games to drop to a No. 7 playoff seed. Still, the line on their graph is rising, while that of the Cubs seems to be heading in the opposite direction.

Except for the favored L.A. Dodgers, the current playoffs look up for grabs, so chances of an-all Chicago World Series are small—5%, I read somewhere, although I have no idea how that figure was reached. But that’s not bad, considering.

 Yes, 2020 has been a terrible time for some things and a difficult one for many others. Yes, more teams (16) made the MLB playoffs than didn’t (14). And yes, both the Cubs and Sox might be sidelined after first-round play.  For Chicago baseball, however, it’s still been a very good year.