Your
local pro or college team has a home game scheduled for the evening. The game
will be televised. Do you want to go to the expense and trouble of attending or
are you content to stay home and watch it on the tube?
Increasingly,
fans are opting for the latter choice, and no wonder. With traffic tough
everywhere and ticket prices high and rising, it takes quite a lot to budge us
from our living rooms, especially in this day of high-def TV. My set is five
years old but its picture still is so sharp I can recognize faces in the crowds
of the games I watch. Plus, the fridge
is near at hand and I can use the toilet without having to stand in line.
Yeah, I
know, it’s fun to go to games—to be out with the like-minded crowd that cheers on
the home team. We urbanites (that is, just about all of us) live atomized
existences these days, penned into a daily round of work or play and home
that’s notably short on communal experiences. Instead of going to the movies we
use Netflix, instead of shopping at the mall we click on ebay or amazon, instead
of voting at a neighborhood polling place we fill in our ballots at our kitchen
tables and mail in the results.
Agorophobia used to be an illness but now it’s a national condition.
Sports
provide an antidote, but one that gets progressively harder to exercise for
most people. My own example is a case in point. In 1972 I and three pals went in
on a pair of season tickets for the basketball Chicago Bulls, who were just
getting established in our home city. The tix were good, in the second row of
the first balcony in Chicago Stadium, on a line with the Bulls’ bench. If
memory serves they cost $5 or $6 per, or about $100 for my 10 or 11 games, well
within my reporter’s budget.
Our
group renewed annually for 22 years, and while ticket prices regularly rose they
were in the $25-$28 range through 1993, still affordable. Then the Bulls moved
into the vastly larger United Center, whose configuration is quite different
from that of the Stadium. The seats in the new place the team considered comparable
to ours were in the second balcony, far removed from the action, and almost
twice as expensive. Seeing the games from there would have been like watching
them on a 12-inch TV screen. We said no
thanks and ended the relationship, and with it my career as a season-ticket
holder.
Twenty-years-ago
prices seem quaint now, of course. The average single-game ticket in the NBA
now costs about $50 and that’s for a not-good seat; according to the Bull’s current
seating chart the ones we gave up now go for $125, and there’s a waiting list
to get them. Team Marketing Report says the NFL led the average-price standings
last season at $78, followed by the NHL at $61. Major League Baseball was last
at $27. Throw in the usual 20 bucks or
so for stadium parking and $30 or $40 more for ballpark food and the game bill
for a couple today runs from $100 to more than $200, too rich for my blood.
You
can beat those numbers, but only if you live in or near a city where sports aren’t
a religion. I do, in Scottsdale, AZ, near Phoenix. There, the baseball Diamondbacks
usually play to half-filled houses no matter how they’re faring afield, and
ticket prices are low. The seats wife Susie and I like best are 10 to 12 rows
up in the upper deck behind home plate, from where the field stretches out
before us. They go for $16 each, and I know a lot where I can park about two
blocks from the back gates for six bucks. Add $11 for a brat with kraut and a
Pepsi for me (Susie can’t stomach ballpark food and brings her own) and we get
off for about $50, not bad as those things go. We’re usually good for 5-6 games
a year.
That
doesn’t work here for the other major sports, though, nor does it ever in
places like Chicago, Boston, Dallas and New York, where triple-digit prices for
single games are common (especially in the so-called secondary market) and
lawyers and commodity traders fill the stands. Add the constant fact that
everyone at home sees the games better than anyone in the stadiums and you have
the attendance declines of the past few years. The gates in the Big 2 sports of
baseball and football both peaked in 2007, and while the declines have been
small—averaging about 1% a year in each—they’ve been large enough to attract
front-office attention.
The
main way teams are attempting to lure the couch-bound is by making their
stadiums more like living rooms. Jumbotrons—huge
video display units—decorate stadiums coast to coast. The biggest so far is the
one that hangs in Cowboy Stadium in Dallas, that capital of crass. It measures
72 feet by 160 feet. It’s due, however, to be dwarfed by a 55-by-301 unit
ordered by the NFL Jacksonville Jaguars. You’ll note that width is one foot
longer than the football playing field.
Jumbotrons
carry some of the video replays fans get at home, along with game stats and various
between-innings or timeout entertainments. Mostly, though, they’re billboards
that turn paying customers into captive audiences for whatever ads home teams
can book. A Jumbotron is being planned for Wrigley Field, that erstwhile temple
of baseball purity, and Cubs’ owner Tom Ricketts makes no bones about declaring
that he wants it for the ad revenue it will generate. That’s honest but it
doesn’t make me like him better.
Worse by me is
the way the huge TV screens dominate any premises they occupy, turning the action
on the field into an afterthought. Their 1984 aspect is magnified when they
take to exhorting crowd reactions. At Chase Field in Phoenix, my home park of
late, the ovine fans rarely budge unless Jumbo tells them to stand, clap or
dance, or sounds that silly “charge” bugle.
I’m embarrassed for them. I’ve known how to
behave at ball games since I was 10 and need no prompting. At least when I’m
watching at home no one tells me what to do, unless it’s to take out the
garbage or something similar.
2 comments:
Fred,
We also had season tickets to pro sports, Baseball, Hockey and Soccer when we lived in Philly. There's nothing like being on hand for the action, but as we get older and have moved to the Phoenix area, there's little that entices us to watch any sporting event in person. (Can you blame us for the counted upon poor performance of Phoenix based teams?)
TV is fine. Much less hassle and with all the attributes you pointed out.
These days, if I want to see a live sporting event, it'll be a college game where the prices are far less and the excitement and partisan emotions are far greater.
Of course, there's always the most economical Fall Ball baseball which generally features post university players on the way up to the pros.
Tonight, there's a Guinness Cup 'Soccer' Football game being played in Phoenix. It'll feature Real Madrid and The L.A. Galaxy, each team featuring some among the best players in Football. Though a rabid Football follower, I'll be watching on TV.
Mike Levy
Fred--a friend passed your blog onto me. We wrote for the DI and went to U of I at same time. I wound up in Chicago broadcasting and enjoyed reading your pieces in WSJ. You're right on target with being there vs. the flat screen. The Stadium days with the Bulls + the Hawks were amazing sports bargains never to be seen again.
Best wishes--Dave Baum
Post a Comment