You’d
hardly know it to look at me now but I was a little guy growing up, and acutely
aware of the athletic limitations that attached to my stature. Thus, one of my
early sports heroes was Nellie Fox, a little guy who made good (very good) on
the Major League Baseball stage.
Little
Nell played second base for the Chicago White Sox for most of a long career. He
was known mostly for two things: an
ever-present cheek-full of chewing tobacco so large that it made him look
unbalanced, and an almost-unerring ability to hit the baseball. In his 19 years
in the Bigs (1947-65) he struck out just 216 times, and never more than 18 in
any season. His strike-out rate of once in 42.7 plate appearances ranks third
on the all-time list, behind two players (Joe Sewell and Lloyd Waner) who
performed during much-earlier eras.
Fox’s
ability to make contact was partly inborn, of course, but also partly learned.
Knowing that someone his size wasn’t likely to hit many home runs (he’s listed officially
at 5-foot-10 and 160 pounds but his height really was closer to 5-foot-8), he used
what was called a “bottle bat,” one almost as thick in the handle as in the
barrel, and choked up on it a good two inches. The bat’s weight (34 or 35
ounces) and shape enabled him to get “good wood’ on a ball even when he didn’t
strike it cleanly, and the choke increased his bat control. The upshots were 2,663 career hits, 12
All-Star Game selections, the 1959 American League Most Valuable Player award
and his election to the game’s Hall of Fame.
As you might suspect, I bring up Fox’s name
for more than nostalgic reasons. As Simon and Garfunkel yearned in song for Joe
DiMaggio’s grace of style and movement, I yearn for Nellie’s ball-hitting
ability at a time when the strikeout—the whiff, the Big K—has become baseball’s
signature play. Major Leaguers today are
fanning with abandon, grabbing some bench at a rate unprecedented in their
sport’s annals. In 2013 the 30 MLB teams each averaged about 7.6 strikeouts a
game, capping a rise that began in the 1920s, and this season promises to
continue the trend.
Relatedly, overall batting averages
have declined for seven straight seasons (to .253 last year from .269 in 2006)
and scoring also has waned. We are in
the midst of a Decade of the Pitcher unmatched since the 1960s, when a dearth
of runs forced the last major change in the game’s essential math, the 1969
lowering of the pitchers’ mound to 10 inches above field level from 15. The way
it’s going, having pitchers throw from below ground level might not be enough
to reverse things.
Now as then the hitters’ woes stem
mostly from advances in pitching, not so much in the brilliance of the
individual performers (the likes of Koufax and Gibson are nowhere to be seen)
but in their method of utilization. Whereas
in former days complete games by pitchers were common, managers now employ
their arms sequentially, meaning that hitters must begin adjusting to different
deliveries each time at bat from the sixth or seventh inning on. That just
about every team today has a bullpen full of relievers who stand 6-foot-4 or
taller and can throw a peach through an oak tree makes the batsman’s job
tougher yet. Add in the development of
the slider, which looks like a fastball coming in but dives at the last moment,
and you wonder how anyone manages to hit the ball.
But changes could—and should—be
made do to redress the offense-defense balance that keeps people interested in
what’s up on the field. Both are things that just about every fan notices but still
go largely unremarked because of their ubiquity. One is the de facto expansion
of the strike zone, which makes just about every at-bat a guessing game for
hitters.
The rule book says the strike zone
is 17 inches wide (the width of home plate) and in height from the midpoint
between the shoulders and the belt to the bottom of the knees. A few years ago
some umpires talked openly about “their” strike zones, as though its boundaries
were arbitrary. You don’t hear that any more but you certainly see it. Some
umps call the “high” strike and some don’t, most add a couple of inches to the
plate’s outside edge whichever way a batter stands, and the zone’s usual height
is from the belt to mid-shin.
The zone is supposed to vary with
the height and stance of the hitter, but actually it seems fixed. I get a kick
out of the way umps call strikes on the same low pitches whether the batter
stands 5-foot-10 or 6-6. The low-ball-strike bias is especially helpful to slider
pitchers, whose deliveries dip. Enforcing the rules on the books would give
hitters a better shake.
The other change would be tougher to implement
because it would affect the way batters go about their business. The notion
that “chicks dig the long ball,” impressed during the steroids-and-homers-happy
1990s, remains alive and well in baseball despite the dip in the power supply.
Just about every batter, it seems—little guys as well as big—swings for the
fences no matter what the score or situation. And if the result often is a
“K”—the most-wasteful of outs—well, that’s the price of glory.
It’s axiomatic in baseball that
power hitters strike out a lot, but it’s not true. History’s three most
prolific home-run producers—Barry Bonds, Hank Aaron and Babe Ruth—recorded as
many as 100 strikeouts just once in their combined 62 seasons as big-league
regulars, the exception coming in Bonds’
1986 rookie year. By contrast, “banjo” hitters commonly rack up 100 whiffs
these days, and boomers like Adam Dunn and Chris Davis top or push the 200K
mark. One free-swinging palooka, Mark Reynolds, struck out 834 times in a
recent four-year span (2008-11), and the miracle is that he still is being paid
to play the game.
Most hitters today use light (31- or 32-ounce),
whippy bats that are big in the barrel and narrow at the handle, grip them down
all the way and put everything into every swing. The fact that the approach
usually makes no sense tactically doesn’t seem to penetrate their brains, or those
of their coaches’.
C’mon guys, be more like Nellie. Get a bat
with some heft, choke up a bit (as Bonds did in the later stages of his
career), and strive for contact. The result will be more runs, not fewer.
1 comment:
If you watch a baseball game in which you aren't rooting for one of the teams the two most boring plays are the home run and the strikeout. I would rather see a bases-loaded triple with the fielders madly trying to get the ball to the infield that watch a ball sail into the stands. Same with the strikeout--I'd rather watch the fielders ply their trade than a batter whiff and walk back to the dugout. I still play softball and even those metal and composite sticks have a narrow grip which I enlarge with gobs to tape. Being a table-setter for the big guns like Nellie is no shame.
Post a Comment