Passover
and the new Major League Baseball season arrived in a near dead heat a few days
ago, so I think it’s apt to apply a signature question about the former to the
latter; namely, “How is this season different from all other seasons?”
The
answer is that this MLB campaign had an earlier start (March 29) than any
previous one, if you don’t count the couple of years when teams went to Japan
or Australia to play a series before the rest of the teams got underway. The
jump was part of a collective-bargaining agreement that provided for three or
four more days off for each club during the regular schedule. It also ensures
that, absent rain outs, the World Series will end before November begins, the
better to avoid the possibility that mittens might replace mitts in the annual
classic.
Baseball’s
move follows that of the National Basketball Association, which also started
its 2017-18 season a week earlier than before, although that was little noted
at the time. The extra week allowed the NBA to eliminate such inhumane
practices as having teams play four games in five nights, or 18 games in 30. It
also reduced the number of back-to-back contests teams play and threw in an
occasional extra off day.
The
issue of schedule length has been very much alive in all our major team sports
these past few years, matching the concern about a perceived increase in player
injuries. Just about everyone agrees that the annual schedules of our premier
professional baseball, football, basketball and hockey leagues are too long, but
everybody also recognizes that it’s highly unlikely that will change anytime
soon. That’s because schedule length is governed by commerce, not competition,
and both the players and owners know that nobody makes money when the store isn’t
open. The only one of our Big Four pro loops to reduce its calendar in recent
decades was the National Hockey League, which went to its present 82 games a
team from 84 in 1995-96. The reason for the move was obscure, as is the
reasoning behind much of what the NHL does.
Professional
athletes are paid to do things other people do for fun so it’s hard to gin up
much sympathy for claims they are overworked, but one can make that case
nonetheless. Athletes are bigger, faster and stronger than they used to be, and
while they get paid more they work harder, too, following the year-around
training schedules they need to maintain their places. It’s a sports paradox that the closer an
athlete comes to peak fitness the more susceptible he is to injury and the less
it takes to push him over the edge. The wise trainer includes a good amount of
rest in his regimens but athletes are as likely as not to ignore it. The motto “no
pain, no gain” still resonates despite being largely discredited.
It’s ironic that the sport that has the
biggest injury problem has been least amenable to making schedule changes to
address it. That would be football, where after the second or third week of the
season every player hurts some place all the time. The National Football League
went to a consistent 12-game regular season in 1947, to 14 games in 1961 and to
the present 16 games in 1978, and while it cut its summer training-game
schedule to four games from six in that last year it’s budged no further since.
The discussion about cutting football players’
workload has of late focused on cutting the so-called preseason, which almost all observers
agree is too long. The owners resist, mostly because they charge their
season-ticket holders full price for the two exhibitions each hosts annually.
That embodies the “because we can” philosophy that rules the league.
The NBA’s regular-season schedule
has stood at 82 games since 1967-68, a time when, in retrospect, the players
looked smaller and the games were run at slower-mo. This season’s early
start hasn’t seemed to have had much effect on contending teams’ practice of
sitting healthy veterans (and, thus, shortchanging fans) to preserve them for
the playoffs, Nor has it noticeably affected the injury rate; in one recent
game the defending-champion Golden State Warriors sat their four best players
(Steph Curry, Kevin Durant, Clay Thompson and Draymond Green) for various
causes. The league is coming to rival the NFL in the role injuries play in
determining playoff outcomes.
Baseball is the least strenuous of
our major sports but it’s also the one with the longest regular season– a
26-week, 162-game grind before this season’s one-week extension. A little math shows that worked out to 20 days
off a season for each team, or less than one a week, and the numbers were worse
when you note that four of the days off came together, at All Star Game time.
Between about 1920 and 1960 the baseball regular
season was 154 games, with each team in the 16-team, two-league setup playing
each of its seven league rivals 22 times. The 162-game format was established
when the Majors expanded to 20 teams in 1961 and 1962, with each team playing
its nine league foes 18 times. Now, with 30 teams and interleague play, the
neat arithmetic has been scraped, but the number 162 has become sacrosanct, as
do most baseball numbers that have been around for a while.
Baseball players stand (and sit) around
a lot during their games, but between the contests their exercise routines are
far tougher than they used to be, and their body shapes show it. Add the facts that pitchers throw harder than
they once did, and batters swing harder, and you have a physically
more-demanding game than in years past.
Adding a few more rest days to the schedule is
a plus, but a better answer would be to also increase each team’s in-season
roster size to 27 players from 25. Baseball
managers tend to use their benches more than other sport’s coaches and dressing
one more pitcher and position player would spread the work around more, to the
benefit of all. One reason sports schedules never contract is that the players,
through their unions, won’t abide the salary cuts that might result, but they’d
be sure to like the extra jobs larger rosters would create. The owners would have to pay two more guys
(probably at MLB minimums), but, heck, a 10-cent increase in ballpark beer
prices probably would cover that.
No comments:
Post a Comment