Two
entities that rank at or near the bottom of their classes in just about every
measure of public approval—the U.S. Congress (politics) and thoroughbred horse
racing (sports)-- are getting together
to do something that ought to improve the odors of both. Any day now Congress
is expected to approve the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act, aimed at curing
many of the governing defects that have plagued the sport.
The act
would create national standards for such things as track safety and maintenance,
injury-data collection and disciplinary processes and sanctions, and put them
under the control of an authority overseen by the Federal Trade Commission.
More importantly, it would place drug testing and administration in the hands
of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), an independent body utilized by many
sports.
The
action would replace in large part the hodgepodge of state agencies that govern
(or misgovern) thoroughbred racing in the states that permit it. There are 38
of those bodies and they vary widely in competence and honesty. What is banned
in one state might be permitted in another, making a shambles of rule
enforcement. They’ve been sustained by raw politics—states have been loathe to
give up any part of the patronage, perks and power the current system provides.
The state boards and commissions won’t go
away; they’ll still oversee many daily racetrack operations. And they’ll still
run things for a while because for some reason the act won’t take effect until
2022. But after that issues that cut across state lines will be decided by a
nine-member national authority, five of whose members must be free of ties to
the sport.
In a show of nonpartisanship rare
in Washington these days, the measure passed the U.S. House by voice vote in September
and was sent along to the Senate. There it has quite a few named sponsors
including the Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell from the racing mecca
of Kentucky, without whose support nothing moves in that body. Approval is expected
to come before the January change of administrations. President Trump’s
signature is said to be about as sure as anything is with him.
Behind the act are years of
malfeasance that have made the sport a synonym for corruption just about
everywhere it operates, sustained because of the jobs it provides (about one
million nationally) and the state tax money it produces. If anything, its stink has only increased in
recent years, fueled by doping scandals that seem to grow ever larger and more
complex.
Last March 27 horse trainers,
veterinarians, pharmacists and other track employees were indicted after a
wide-ranging FBI investigation into performance-enhancing drug use-allegedly
affecting dozens of horses that ran on the New Jersey race tracks. Among the
group was the well-known trainer Jason Servis, whose colt Maximum Security won
the 2019 Kentucky Derby before being disqualified for cutting off other horses
in the race’s homestretch run. He and the other defendants have pleaded not
guilty. No trial date has been set.
Doping suspicions have trailed
other leading trainers, including Bob Baffert, long the sport’s shining star.
He has saddled six Kentucky Derby winners and two winners of the elusive Triple
Crown for three-year-olds, American Pharoah in 2015 and Justify in 2018. Twenty nine of his horses have failed drug
tests over the past 40 years including four in the last six months. One of
those animals was Gamine, the winner of a million-dollar Breeders Cup race
three weeks ago.
Reporting by the excellent Joe
Drape of the New York Times, one of the few newspapers that cover the sport
beyond small-print lists of entries and results, revealed that Justify failed a
drugs test after winning the 2018 Santa Anita Derby. This might have made the
colt ineligible for the later Triple Crown races, but the California Racing
Board, whose chairman had ties to Baffert, stretched its inquiry into the
matter over four months, long enough to allow the animal to compete in the
series and win. In a closed-door ruling the board eventually attributed the
test failure to “environmental contamination,” letting Baffert off the hook. The
trainer’s previous infractions have been dealt with similarly, with fines or
brief suspensions being the harshest penalties. Most other trainers so
apprehended also have received such treatment.
Really¸ though, the hay bale that broke
the holdouts’ backs was the death of 30 horses from training or racing mishaps during
the Santa Anita winter meeting of 2018-19. That roused not only the sport’s usual
animal-rights critics but also the public at large. Along with its bureaucratic name, the act now
pending in Washington ought to include an “in memoriam” reference to the Santa
Anita fallen.
Congress’s willingness to protect
equine lives stands in contrast to its unwillingness to do the same for some
human athletes, namely boxers. It did pass the Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act
of 2000, which set national guidelines for medical matters in the sport, fighter-manager
contracts and divisional ratings systems, but left enforcement in the hands of the
state commissions, some of whose bumbling helped create the need for such legislation. Boxing’s lack of
proper governance mirrors that of horse racing and calls for the same remedy.
Sen. John McCain led the push for the Ali Act
and his death in 2018 left a boxing-advocacy void in Washington. Someone should step up to
fill it, and the sooner the better.
3 comments:
My best friend (we went through high school and college together and he was the best man at my wedding) served for several years on the Michigan Boxing Commission. Once, over a reunion dinner, I asked him what it was like to be a boxing commissioner. His response: "It's everything you imagine it to be, and less."
SO did Gamine get stripped of the win since the test was positive? Or was that before the race?
Gamine's positive test was for a previous race.
Post a Comment