NEWS:
Kerry Wood retires.
VIEWS: All athletes retire eventually, either on
purpose or by necessity, but this one came as a jolt. That’s not because of
Wood’s age (34) or professional longevity (14 seasons in the Major Leagues),
both of which were appropriate to his announcement. It’s because of the image
that I and, I’m sure, others carry of the pitcher.
It
stems from the May 6, 1998, weekday afternoon in which Wood, a 20-year-old
Chicago Cubs’ rookie, tied a record by striking out 20 Houston Astros en route
to a one-hit, 2-0 victory. Memorable days like that have been rare in the
annals of his woebegone team, but this certainly was one. Working at home I was
able to watch the game on TV, and it was marvelous to behold.
The Astros that day were a
formidable bunch, their lineup including the probable future Hall of Famers
Jeff Bagwell and Craig Biggio, but the tall right-hander handled them like the
big kid pitching to little ones in a Little League matchup. His fastballs
hissed and his sliders seemingly took 45-degree turns. And he was so young!
His—and his team’s—future glowed rosily.
It didn’t work out that way. Wood
missed a month with arm problems before his rookie year ended, and he sat out
the entire next season with elbow surgery. While he
managed to have a few decent seasons after that, he spent so much time on the
Disabled List that some thought his initials were D.L. His career victory total
of 86 fell about 200 short of what many might have predicted after his signal
achievement.
Steve Stone said when Wood retired
that the pitcher’s body failed him, but I think the canny broadcaster was being
disingenuous. My take is that Wood’s problem was mental, and perhaps rooted in
his May glory day. He didn’t want to just retire the batters he faced, he
wanted to blow them away, every one, and in consequence strained and restrained
his arm while never bothering to develop the subtler ascents of his art. His focus seemed always to be on the “K,” not
on the “W,” which, as you may have noticed, are his actual initials.
NEWS: Joe Ricketts doesn’t like
President Obama.
VIEWS: Most billionaires don’t, of
course, and some of them are bankrolling ad campaigns to persuade people that
the Prez is a freedom-hating Kenyan socialist who is either a Muslim or an
acolyte of the black-liberationist Christian preacher Jeremiah Wright (never
mind which). But most billionaires don’t head a family that owns a Big League
sports team, as Ricketts does.
When poppa’s political plans surfaced, his
offspring who run the Cubs dived for cover, and eventually took him with them.
That was after someone pointed out that the team was seeking city and state financing
for a proposed $300 million Wrigley Field renovation, and that the city and
state involved are led by Democrats who might not appreciate their patriarch’s
activities.
In truth, though, the government-off-my-back
political stance Ricketts espouses has been thoroughly trashed by his family’s ball
club. While the Cubs are looking for taxpayer bucks in Illinois they already
are getting them in Arizona, the otherwise famously conservative state where
they make their spring headquarters. There the city of Mesa is putting up $84
million of the $99 million it’s supposed to cost to build the team new
spring-training digs, replacing the ones the city had built for it previously.
The deal also includes a Cub option to buy city land for commercial development
around the stadium, at lower-than-market prices.
The Cubs have trained in Mesa since
1979, yet like most enterprises angling for a government handout they
threatened to move (to Naples, Florida) if they didn’t get one. This is from a low-rent
burg that’s as hard up as most these days and has had to lay off employees to
close budget gaps. But what are political principles when there’s money to be
made, right Joe?
NEWS: I’ll Have Another goes for
horse racing’s Triple Crown.
VIEWS: No three-year-old has won
the Kentucky Derby, Preakness and Belmont Stakes in the same year since
Affirmed in 1978, but I’ll Have Another could end that drought at the Belmont
in New York on June 9. That would give his sport a needed shot of favorable
publicity, albeit probably a short-lived one.
Don’t get your hopes too high,
though. Since Affirmed’s feat, 10 other colts have won the Derby and Preakness but
failed in the grueling (1 ½-mile) Belmont, and trends in equine breeding and
training that emphasize speed over stamina make its accomplishment less likely
than in past years. Also, the Derby co-favorite Union Rags and Dullahan, the
fast-closing third-place finisher in the Kentucky race, should be on hand to
challenge, and because they skipped the Preakness will have the advantage of
freshness.
Further, and typically for racing,
I’ll Have Another’s tale has a dark side. That would be the history of his
trainer, Doug O’Neill, who last week was slapped with a 45-day suspension and
$15,000 fine for doping another horse in California, his usual stomping
grounds. The penalty was the fourth levied against the man whom my Turf
Paradise race-book cohorts say is known back home as Doug O’Needle.
O’Needle (oops, O’Neill), however,
is an angel compared with Rick Dutrow, who in 2008 saddled the last Derby-Preakness
winner, Big Brown. That fella has been cited for various violations 64 times in
nine states since 1979, and last October in New York was socked with a big one
that includes a 10-year suspension. Still, he trains on while his appeals pend
and was the second-winningest trainer in the last meet at Aqueduct. Similarly
(and conveniently), O’Neill’s most-recent penalty won’t kick in until after the
Belmont.
Racing’s big story in recent
decades has been the rise in the use of medications, legal and otherwise, to
keep horses running, and the related upswing in on-track spills that threaten
the lives of horses and jockeys. The underlying problem is that the sport is
run by a hodgepodge of state governing bodies that vary greatly in honesty and
competence. It and boxing need the most regulation but get the least. No Triple
Crown should obscure that.
1 comment:
I enjoyed your Derby preview column but don't remember reading much about I'll Have Another. Since you are obviously well informed on the subject, this underscores to me the risky nature of equine handicapping and wagering. Presumably even "The Genius" would have overlooked this horse and bet accordingly, or perhaps sat this race out. No wonder so few can make a living at the track.
Post a Comment